2 months free annual plan. Get Growth Access
University

LBOX University

Research on how AI engines find, judge and recommend companies.

Buyers now ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude which company to choose before they visit a single website. LBOX University studies how those answers are made, what the engines read, and what decides who gets named. Every figure carries its source and its date.

4
AI engines studied
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude
28,492
Citations classified
LBOX dataset, Sep 2026
250+
Industries covered
with companies and professionals
Published research

Read the research

The Great Decoupling
The Great Decoupling in Nine Slides

The whole argument with one point per slide: clicks fell, almost nobody clicks inside AI answers, the visit moved to a second search, named brands get 2.3 times the visits, dashboards cannot see it, those buyers convert better, everyone sells the mention, and what LBOX.com does about it. Opens full screen for presenting.

Read 9 slides
The Great Decoupling
The Second-Search Hypothesis: Where the Lost Clicks Go

What LBOX.com believes: the buying decision moved into the AI answer, and the visit moved to a second step that goes to the brand the answer named. Six claims with their evidence and status, the before-and-after journey map per 100 people with drop-off, redirect and gain, the named-versus-left-out proof, and the tests that would prove it wrong.

Read 10 min read
The Great Decoupling
Where the Clicks Went: The Commercial Guide to the Great Decoupling

The buyer now decides inside the AI answer and acts in a second step: a search for the chosen brand on Google, Amazon or the brand site. Before and after charts of the decoupling, the five-step journey with evidence at each step, the new stated value of AI visibility, why "get found by AI" stops short, and the correct-or-embrace map LBOX.com works from.

Read 19 min read
The Great Decoupling
The Great Decoupling: The Evidence

Who documented the decoupling and with what data, every credible click-loss study with sample, method and limits, the Search Console reporting events that distort the picture (num=100, the 2025 impression logging error, core updates), and how third-party tools estimate traffic.

Read 13 min read
The Great Decoupling
Measuring AI-Driven Click Loss: The Field Method

Two procedures a practitioner can follow: the outside-in estimate from public data (formulas, confidence by step, worked example) and the Search Console confirmation with clean date windows and a control group. Ends with how to measure the gain side: branded search, AI referrals and answer share.

Read 6 min read
Studies in progress

What we are testing now

Study in progress
Does AI reward verified impact, or repeat what companies say?

About 20 impact buying questions across clean energy, sustainable goods, recycling and impact services, each asked as a general question and as a sustainability question on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. Every impact claim in the answers is traced to its source: certification registries, independent coverage, forums, retailers, or the company marketing itself.

Method fixed before the first run. Results will be published here in full.

Explore renewable energy companies
How we work

Our research standards

Primary sources

Studies are read in full at the source. A figure we cannot trace to its original stays out.

Every figure dated

Each number carries its source, sample size, engines and date, because AI answers change from week to week.

Evidence graded

Measured findings, single tests and reasoned hypotheses are labelled differently and never mixed.

Method first

For our own studies the questions and the method are fixed before the first run, then published with the results.

Put the research to work on your own market

Companies, contacts, products and AI answers for your industry, in one place.

Start free